Walter Gleis- und Fahrzeugbau KG, München

Zitat

Originally posted by Walter1940

No, not from Aerosoft. The Autor is Burkhardt Schmidt.

@johnm
@Seelenquell

The Autor is Burkhardt Schmidt !!.
REPEAT - The Autor is Burkhardt Schmidt !!.

Clearly, neither of you know Burkhardt Schmidt ?
(Klar, keiner von Ihnen wissen, Burkhardt Schmidt?)

:schock: :schock:

Zitat

Originally posted by Seelenquell
.......>>>>>>>>mir is eigentlich egal, wer der autor ist. ich hab nur einen tip gegeben. jemand wollte eine meinung wissen. feddisch.

[strike]Es ist sehr erfreulich festzustellen, die obige Erklärung ab.[/strike] Es ist sehr erfreulich, die obige Aussage zu lesen. :zwinkern:
(It is very pleasing to note the above statement.) :zwinkern:

[comment=Banjo]Changed the german text to be more understandable by non-english readers. Don't be offended ;-)[/comment]
Thank you Banjo - not offended at all.

Walter: Ich dachte nur, dass du vielleicht einen ICE V machst. Und das Aerosoft-Addon mit dem ICE habe ich, der sieht im MSTS nicht gerade umwerfend aus. :zwinkern: :biggrins
@Johnm: Will you realease your ICE-Amtrak?

Wenn wir hier gerade schon am Gange sind, gibt´s noch etwas Senf von mir obendrauf:
Wie der ein oder andere schon meinte, die Wagen sind definitiv zu breit, viel breiter als die Triebköpfe
(oder hast du zufällig nen übergewichtigen Passagier in die Waggons eingemoddet?:biggrins ).
Zu den Triebköpfen selbst: Sehr gut gelungen, nur ich denke, dass der Original-Triebkopf des ICE1 etwas steiler zum Dach hoch ging. Und die rote Rahmenlinie macht vorne an der Schnauze des Kopfes eine, meiner Meinung nach, ganz unschöne Wellenbewegung.
Kann sein, dass ich mich irre, aber dies meine ehrliche Meinung dazu.

Loco - Nicki

Also Johns ICE sieht auch geil aus. Der gefällt mir und ob jetzt noch ein ICE Amtrak, S, V, X, Y, 1, 2, 3 oder 87 kommt, ist doch eigentlich egal. Die beiden haben geile Modelle in der Mache und der Relaese wird mich vielleicht sogar in's Koma bringen.

PS: @ Walter: Wieso denn nicht den von Stefan Puffler?

Verspätete Weihnachtsgeschenke kommen immer gut an. :kopfnicken: Warum kann nicht jeden Tag Weihnachten sein? :zwinkern2:

Zitat

Originally posted by Walter1940
Keine Freigabe bis jetzt.

@ Walter, I think it has been released before now. http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=34761

Don't forget, Union Pacific requires you need their permission and get a license before You can distribute models of their trains in any software, including freeware.

locomotiongamer: it is in the US set. there is a bug fix in 1.0.2 update

Warum braucht man denn neben der Erlaubnis des 3D-Modell-Schöpfers (wenn man es nicht schon selbst ist) noch ne Erlaubnis der Eisenbhangesellschaft, die das Fahrzeug im Original betreibt(betrieben hat)? Dann müßte ja die halbe Filebase von der DB AG (Mehdorn....) abgesegnet sein !?.....

Walter: ich meine mich zu erinnern, daß es auf dem Screenshot zu deinen preußischen Länderbahnwagen eine sächsische Kreuzspinne den Zug gezogen hat....nun ja... ähm...darf die Locomotiongemeinde hoffen, dereinst auch dieses Fahrzeug auf ihren Schienen benutzen zu dürfen? Die würde nämlich für alle möglichen (Neben)Strecken sehr gut passen! :kopfnicken:

gruß an alle

Zitat

Originally posted by Walter1940
......>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
For this railroad engine I have the permission. It is better if one nothing says if one not point what it is about.

Walter - well done.
You get 100% support from me. :zwinkern:

@johnm :schlafen:
Please note Walters reply:-
"It is better if one nothing says
if one not point what it is about."

"It is better if one nothing says
if one not point what it is about."

I guess Google Translator failed miserably. How about that:
It's better not to say anything if you don't know what it's about.

Ich erahne zwar den Sinngehalt der vorangegangenen Posts, aber nur weil JohnM englisch-Muttersprachler ist, wäre ich dankbar, wenn wir zur allgemeinen Verkehrssprache dieser Website zurückkehren könnten....

Zitat

Originally posted by Walter1940

So wie auf dem hier angehängten Bild kommt sie raus. Das ist jetzt der letzte Stand der Technik. :zwinkern:

For this railroad engine I have the permission. It is better if one nothing says if one not point what it is about.

Maybe instead of just snapping back, read what what I said. I did not ask of You have permission for the model. I was offering a friendly reminder that the Union Pacific Railroad requires You to get a license from them to put Any item from any of the following Railroads in to MSTS or Locomotion.

Unlike the DB, UP is not so friendly. They are suing model makers and video game add on makers for use of their logos and name.

Zitat

UP.COM Union Pacific Licensing Program
Union Pacific owns one of the oldest and most famous corporate trademarks in the nation, as well as many other historic railroad trademarks that were acquired and are used by Union Pacific.

In order to protect the company's trademarks from unauthorized use and potential harm, Union Pacific requires a license agreement for commercial uses of these marks on goods or for services. These restrictions do not apply to in-home model railroad hobbyists who create Union Pacific-branded equipment for personal use.

Union Pacific's trademarks :

Alton & Southern
American Refrigerator Transit
Chicago and North Western
Denver & Rio Grande
Missouri-Kansas-Texas (Katy)
Missouri Pacific
Pacific Fruit Express
Southern Pacific
St. Louis Southwestern (Cotton Belt)
Texas & Pacific
Union Pacific
Union Pacific Fruit Express
Western Pacific

Alles anzeigen

This includes MSTS and Locomotion freeware.

The same goes for Canadian Pacific. I recall You remember the email You got from them. I got one from UP also. I had to apply for a license or remove my sets.

I'm am not trying to be rude, I am letting you know some information..

Zitat

This is a statement i got from Brenda Mainwaring of Corporate relations at the Union Pacific Railroad. She seems very cooperative and general liscencing for freeware repainters and payware. Below is a statement she sent me to clear up UP's regaurd on particularly Train-Sim matters.

"Union Pacific has implemented a licensing program to monitor and regulate use of trademarks of the constituent and historic railroads that comprise the modern Union Pacific. Anyone who wishes to use one of these trademarks in a train simulator program needs to request permission in the form of a licensee application. For hobbyists who are not affiliated with software manufacturers or distributors and who distribute their product as freeware, there will be no fee associated with the licensing contract. Hobbyists may continue to use Union Pacific trademarks for their personal use, but any public distribution of a Union Pacific trademark must be approved in advance by Union Pacific. Licensee applications for model railroaders can
be found on the Union Pacific website at http://www.up.com. Click on "general
public" then "corporate information" then "UP licensing program" to
download a PDF-format file."

Any questions should be directed to "brendamainwaring@up.com

It should be noted that posting of repaints you have done and photos IS permitted.

if you want to mail by USPS the application, send it to the following address.

Brenda Mainwaring
Director, Corporate Relations
Union Pacific Railroad
1416 Dodge Street, Room 801
Omaha, NE 68179

Fill out the application to the best of your ability. Most of us here who paint UP stuff do it for free and we are not a corporation. It may be of merit to e-mail Brenda telling her you are a hobbyist who does freeware repaints and also put that somewhere on the application. This will tell her that you are not making money and that you are not a corporation selling UP products. Also if you get confused on any part of the application e-mail brenda. She is very nice and will answer any questions you may have, she has already been plenty helpfull to me

Here is the fax number if you want to fax in the application
(402)271-6515

Alles anzeigen

PS. BNSF just announced my are going to do the same.

Zitat

Originally posted by Johnm
...........Maybe instead of just snapping back ...
...I'm am not trying to be rude...........

johnm :zwinkern:
Walter nicht Snap wieder auf Sie.
Ich schlage vor, Sie haben Ihre Sache, lassen Walter und lassen Sie seine anderen wie UP tun Thiers.
Beste in der langfristig. : zwinkern:
------------------------------------------------
johnm :zwinkern:
Walter did not snap back at you.
I suggest you do your thing, let Walter do his and leave others like UP do thiers.
Best in the long run. :zwinkern:

:boese: geht das ganze bitte auch auf deutsch? Ich würde dem Gesprächsverlauf gerne folgen können!